B2 · Module 04 · Class 13 — The Investment Memo
Narrative Scene
The TechNova crisis is closed. Marcus Chen's term sheet is in. Now the real work begins: Brian must write the formal investment memo that will accompany the Series C documentation. This document — distributed to Apex Capital, Nordic Capital, and Kestrel Ventures — must make the case for GBP 30M at a post-money valuation of GBP 120M. It must be credible, structured, and persuasive.
Brian is a strong speaker but admits that formal written argumentation does not come naturally to him. He knows what he wants to say; the challenge is signposting the argument clearly so that a reader — especially a lawyer or financial analyst — can follow the logic without ambiguity. The tool for this is discourse markers: the signposts that tell a reader where the argument is going, what kind of point is being made, and how the pieces connect.
Discourse Markers for Argumentation
Discourse markers are words or phrases that signal the logical, structural, or rhetorical relationship between ideas. In formal professional writing — investment memos, board papers, executive reports — they are not optional decoration. They are the architecture of the argument.
1. Frame Markers — opening, closing, and transitioning
Frame markers tell the reader what the writer is about to do, or signal a move to a new section.
Marker | Function |
This memo sets out / addresses / examines... | announces the document's purpose |
Turning to the question of... | moves to a new topic within the same document |
With regard to / With respect to... | introduces a specific sub-topic |
In the section that follows... | previews what comes next |
To summarise the foregoing... | signals a summary of preceding material |
In conclusion / To conclude... | signals the final evaluative move |
2. Evidential Markers — introducing evidence and data
These signals that what follows is grounded in evidence, not opinion.
Marker | Function |
It should be noted that... | flags important supporting information |
As evidenced by... / As demonstrated by... | cites specific evidence for a claim |
The data indicate(s) that... / The figures suggest... | presents quantitative evidence |
A case in point is... | introduces a specific illustrative example |
This is further supported by... | adds a second piece of supporting evidence |
It is worth observing that... | draws attention to a notable but perhaps overlooked fact |
3. Logical Connectors — cause, consequence, and inference
These signal how one idea produces, leads to, or follows from another.
Marker | Function |
As a consequence / As a result / Consequently... | signals a result or outcome |
It follows that... / This implies that... | draws a logical inference |
Given that... / In light of... | provides a causal premise for a claim |
This, in turn, has led to... | shows a chain of causation |
For this reason... / On this basis... | links a conclusion to its premise |
4. Additive Markers — building the argument
These add further points that support or elaborate the same claim.
Marker | Function |
Furthermore... / Moreover... | adds a point of equal or greater importance |
A further consideration is... | adds a supplementary point formally |
Of equal significance is... | adds a point and explicitly weights it |
In addition to the above... | adds without explicitly comparing weight |
Not only... but also... | adds and escalates simultaneously |
5. Summative and Evaluative Markers — drawing conclusions
These appear at the end of a section or argument to synthesise what has been said.
Marker | Function |
On balance... | signals a weighing of competing considerations |
Taken together... / In aggregate... | synthesises several points into one conclusion |
The above analysis suggests / indicates... | links evidence to a conclusion formally |
It is on this basis that... | introduces the conclusion drawn from prior reasoning |
All things considered... | signals a final holistic judgement |
6. Restrictive Markers — scoping and qualifying
These limit the scope of a claim without fully withdrawing it.
Marker | Function |
With the exception of... | acknowledges one counter-case without abandoning the claim |
Confining the analysis to... | narrows scope deliberately |
In so far as... / To the extent that... | qualifies the range of applicability |
Setting aside the question of... | explicitly defers a point for later |
For the purposes of this analysis... | signals a deliberate simplification |
Argumentation and Analysis Language
Term | Meaning | Example in context |
to substantiate | to support a claim with evidence | "This section substantiates the case for a three-market entry." |
commensurate with | proportionate to; at the right level relative to | "The valuation is commensurate with Meridian's growth trajectory." |
to underpin | to provide the foundation or basis for something | "Strong ARR growth underpins the investment thesis." |
deployment | the use or application of capital or resources | "Capital deployment is expected in three tranches." |
traction | evidence of real-world progress or market uptake | "The Mexico pilot demonstrated meaningful commercial traction." |
adjacency | a market or product close to an existing one | "Germany represents a natural geographic adjacency to the UK business." |
return profile | the pattern of expected financial returns | "The return profile is attractive given the market size." |
capital allocation | the decision about where to invest available funds | "Prudent capital allocation is central to the three-market plan." |
headroom | room for growth; capacity above current performance | "The Singapore market offers significant headroom for expansion." |
run rate | the projected annual value of a metric if current trends continue | "Current run rate ARR is GBP 8.4M, with Q2 projections of GBP 9.2M." |
Investment Memo: Executive Summary
Read the opening two sections of Brian's draft investment memo. Every discourse marker is deliberate — notice how they guide the reader.
MERIDIAN TECHNOLOGIES — SERIES C INVESTMENT MEMO Prepared by: Brian Okafor, Director of Strategic Partnerships Distribution: Apex Capital | Nordic Capital | Kestrel Ventures Date: 2 April 2026 | Confidential
1. PURPOSE
This memo sets out the strategic rationale for Meridian Technologies' Series C fundraise of GBP 30 million at a post-money valuation of GBP 120 million. It addresses three questions: why raise now, why these markets, and why this valuation is justified. Turning to each in sequence:
2. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
It should be noted that Meridian's core product — enterprise workflow automation for mid-market B2B companies — operates in a market estimated at GBP 4.2 billion in the UK alone. As evidenced by our current ARR run rate of GBP 8.4 million, we have established a commercially validated position in the UK mid-market.
The data indicate that penetration of equivalent markets in Germany, Mexico, and Singapore remains below 12% for comparable SaaS offerings. This is further supported by the results of our Mexico City pilot (Q3 2025), in which a twelve-week engagement with three enterprise clients produced GBP 340,000 in contracted ARR — a rate of acquisition commensurate with our best UK cohort results.
Furthermore, the regulatory environment in Germany (GDPR-aligned) and Singapore (PDPA-compliant infrastructure) presents no material barrier to entry for a UK-headquartered SaaS provider. A further consideration is that both markets benefit from established professional services ecosystems into which Meridian's partnership model integrates naturally. In light of these factors, the three-market expansion strategy is, on balance, the most capital-efficient path available to the company at this stage of development. |
Comprehension and analysis:
• Underline every discourse marker. Classify each one by category (frame / evidential / logical / additive / summative / restrictive).
• Why does Brian open Section 2 with "It should be noted that..." rather than "Meridian's core product..."?
Practice Exercises
5 questionsNew exercises to reinforce what you learned. Different from the lesson material.
___ the Q3 pilot, Meridian has demonstrated commercial traction in Mexico. [evidential]
___ these three data points, the investment thesis is clear. [summative]
___ the Singapore market entry, all procurement has been finalised. [restrictive — with exception]
The German market is attractive. ___, it presents the lowest regulatory risk of the three. [additive]
Support This Project
Your support keeps these resources free for everyone.
Support the WorkSecure payment — no account required.